CFP Board Imposes Interim Suspension on Patrick M. Egan of Alhambra, California

Certified Financial Planner Board of Standards, Inc. (CFP Board) announced that it has imposed an interim suspension of the CFP® certification against Patrick M. Egan, which is effective as of June 21, 2022.

Pursuant to Mr. Egan’s consent, CFP Board issued an automatic interim suspension order suspending Mr. Egan’s right to use the CFP® certification marks after receiving evidence that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filed a Complaint with the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, seeking remedies for an alleged violation of Rule 15l-1(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, better known as “Reg BI.” In its Complaint, which the SEC brought against Mr. Egan and other co-defendants, the SEC alleged that the defendants failed to comply with care obligations because they failed to exercise reasonable diligence, care and skill to understand the risks, rewards and costs associated with certain alternative investments and by recommending those investments to certain retail customers without a reasonable basis to believe they were in those customers’ best interests. As of the date of the interim suspension order, the SEC’s Complaint remains pending. Under the automatic interim suspension order, Mr. Egan’s right to use the CFP® certification marks is suspended pending CFP Board’s completed investigation and possible further disciplinary proceedings.

An interim suspension is a suspension of a CFP® professional’s Certification and Trademark License during the pendency of proceedings. A Respondent subject to an Interim Suspension Order must not use the CFP® certification marks or state or suggest that Respondent is a CFP® professional while the Interim Suspension Order is in effect. An Interim Suspension Order is a temporary sanction and does not preclude CFP Board from imposing a final sanction. An Interim Suspension Order will remain in place until the Disciplinary and Ethics Commission (DEC) issues a final order or, if an appeal is filed, until CFP Board’s Appeals Commission issues a final order. CFP Board may vacate an Interim Suspension Order if the underlying Professional Discipline is vacated or reversed or if Respondent provides sufficient evidence indicating that Respondent was not the subject of the Professional Discipline. A Hearing Panel of the DEC may issue an Order to vacate an Interim Suspension Order upon a successful Petition to Vacate an Interim Suspension Order by Respondent.

The basis for this decision also may be found on CFP Board’s website at CFP.net/verify, where CFP Board provides the public with:

• An Individual’s CFP Board disciplinary history and CFP® certification status.
• Links to other sources of information about CFP® professionals that may be more recent or that may contain information that has not led to CFP Board discipline and does not appear on CFP Board’s website. This information may include customer disputes, disciplinary actions taken by a regulator or employer, certain criminal matters and certain financial matters (such as bankruptcy proceedings and unpaid judgments or liens).
• Links to the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority’s (FINRA’s) BrokerCheck and the SEC’s Investment Adviser Public Disclosure databases for individuals who are subject to FINRA or SEC oversight.

CFP Board’s Enforcement Process

As part of their certification, CFP® professionals make a commitment to CFP Board to abide by CFP Board’s Code of Ethics and Standards of Conduct (Code and Standards) or its predecessor, the Standards of Professional Conduct (Standards), which included the Code of Ethics and Professional Responsibility, Rules of Conduct and Financial Planning Practice Standards. CFP Board’s Procedural Rules set forth the process for investigating matters and imposing sanctions where violations have been found.

CFP Board enforces its ethical standards by investigating alleged violations and, where there is probable cause to believe there are grounds for sanction, presents a Complaint containing the alleged violations to CFP Board’s DEC. The DEC meets at least six times a year to review any matter in which CFP Board has alleged that a CFP® professional has violated the Code and Standards, or its predecessor Standards, or an individual on the pathway to CFP® certification has violated the Pathway to CFP® Certification Agreement. The DEC functions in accordance with the Procedural Rules and reviews all matters on a case-by-case basis, considering the details specific to an individual case. If the DEC determines there are grounds for sanction, then it may impose a sanction. DEC orders may be appealed by a CFP® professional or by CFP Board pursuant to the Procedural Rules.

In certain circumstances, such as when a CFP® professional is in default due to failure to acknowledge receipt of a Notice of Investigation or file an Answer, CFP Board staff must deliver an Administrative Order of Suspension, Temporary Bar, Revocation or Permanent Bar. Administrative Orders also are subject to appeal.

More information on CFP Board’s enforcement process can be found at CFP.net/ethics/enforcement.